Chris in Texas
02-11-2006, 09:53 AM
On Oct 8 2005 7:46 AM, FL Turbo wrote:
> >
>
> I'd venture to say that any household in the country has a few books
> that could just as well be cut up.
> I know I do.
> Not that they are offensive in any way, just that they are
> uninteresting and irrelevant.
>
> Just because a book is printed doesn't mean it has any value.
> Maybe trashing a book was a big deal in BC (before computers), but the
> sheer volume being spit out from printers today makes it more likely
> that books are more valuable recycled as paper than as reading
> material.
To you. And just because you're probably right can you see the proverbial
slipperly slope such a position puts you on? If you can't, turn around and look
slightly upwards.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder is not just our father's cliche.
Chris
_______________________________________________________________
Watch Lists, Block Lists, Favorites - http://www.recpoker.com
> >
>
> I'd venture to say that any household in the country has a few books
> that could just as well be cut up.
> I know I do.
> Not that they are offensive in any way, just that they are
> uninteresting and irrelevant.
>
> Just because a book is printed doesn't mean it has any value.
> Maybe trashing a book was a big deal in BC (before computers), but the
> sheer volume being spit out from printers today makes it more likely
> that books are more valuable recycled as paper than as reading
> material.
To you. And just because you're probably right can you see the proverbial
slipperly slope such a position puts you on? If you can't, turn around and look
slightly upwards.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder is not just our father's cliche.
Chris
_______________________________________________________________
Watch Lists, Block Lists, Favorites - http://www.recpoker.com