Re: GCA "Cheating Tapes transcribed, finish"

[lift-off]

russ, the seal;

largely what you say is true and after two years I cannot grasp why you
pursue it with such vigor. just ego? because only those that know agree
with you? I would like to see the games cleaned up but do not think it
will happen for the same money reasons that you give. my problem is that
you throw some random fish in the frying pan with the guilty ones. Once
you start everyone becomes dirty. many Vietnamese are guilty of collusion
and other cheating scams but not all. Tak the cambodian is clean (I
think). R Schwartz is CK (stands for crazy kid, given to him 30 or so
years ago). AS is still his partner I imagine. The stardust probably ran
the dirtiest cardroom of all time 20 years ago, but the high limit games
in Las Vegas are always questionable and many who play in them are dirty
and have long been dirty.

And yes Russ is a WCP, don't know why he tries to prove it arguing with
computers and entertainers that claim to be theoreticians. Hey Russ, why
not let the sleeping ones sleep on?


On Jul 24 2003 1:50PM, Newgca wrote:

> Mike Caro: So what limit do you think - 75 is ok or not ok?

_________________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com - http://www.recpoker.com

[BANKROLLONSWOLL]

I THINK IF ANYONE REALLY CARED RUSS WOULD PROBABLY BE SIX FEET DEEP. ALL THE
NAMES JUST LAUGH AT HIM AND THIS ENRAGES HIM MORE. HE GOT CHEATED AND LOST
HIS ASS. OH WELL IT HAPPENS EVERYDAY, EAT OR BE EATEN. GET OVER IT.

"lift-off" <anonymous@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3f2064b3$0$39685$9a6e19ea@news.newshosting.com...
> russ, the seal;
>
> largely what you say is true and after two years I cannot grasp why you
> pursue it with such vigor. just ego? because only those that know agree
> with you? I would like to see the games cleaned up but do not think it
> will happen for the same money reasons that you give. my problem is that
> you throw some random fish in the frying pan with the guilty ones. Once
> you start everyone becomes dirty. many Vietnamese are guilty of collusion
> and other cheating scams but not all. Tak the cambodian is clean (I
> think). R Schwartz is CK (stands for crazy kid, given to him 30 or so
> years ago). AS is still his partner I imagine. The stardust probably ran
> the dirtiest cardroom of all time 20 years ago, but the high limit games
> in Las Vegas are always questionable and many who play in them are dirty
> and have long been dirty.
>
> And yes Russ is a WCP, don't know why he tries to prove it arguing with
> computers and entertainers that claim to be theoreticians. Hey Russ, why
> not let the sleeping ones sleep on?
>
>
> On Jul 24 2003 1:50PM, Newgca wrote:
>
> > Mike Caro: So what limit do you think - 75 is ok or not ok?
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Posted using RecPoker.com - http://www.recpoker.com
>
>

[Dark Detective]

On Jul 24 2003 9:01AM, lift-off wrote:

> russ, the seal;
>
> largely what you say is true and after two years I cannot grasp why you
> pursue it with such vigor. just ego? because only those that know agree
> with you? I would like to see the games cleaned up but do not think it
> will happen for the same money reasons that you give. my problem is that
> you throw some random fish in the frying pan with the guilty ones. Once
> you start everyone becomes dirty. many Vietnamese are guilty of collusion
> and other cheating scams but not all. Tak the cambodian is clean (I
> think). R Schwartz is CK (stands for crazy kid, given to him 30 or so
> years ago). AS is still his partner I imagine. The stardust probably ran
> the dirtiest cardroom of all time 20 years ago, but the high limit games
> in Las Vegas are always questionable and many who play in them are dirty
> and have long been dirty.
>
> And yes Russ is a WCP, don't know why he tries to prove it arguing with
> computers and entertainers that claim to be theoreticians. Hey Russ, why
> not let the sleeping ones sleep on?
>

How would you know if Russ is a WCP? Did you play against him? Or are
you just going by what he and his multiple identites tell you?

If you or someone you know did play against him, how do you know he wasn't
cheating you, and that is the real reason you think he is a highly skilled
WCP? He said that all his games he had teams playing in them. Its easy
to look like a WCP if he has his marked cards too. It has nothing to do
with his skill, it has to do with the fact that he and his team scammed
you. Of course that will make him look like he knows how to play, but
skill isn't why he took down your money.

If you are actually one of the inner circle with Russ and that is why you
know he is a WCP, then maybe you can explain the scams and what people did
EXACTLY, much better than what Russ is doing. By the way, I read this
transcript, and all it showed me was that poker in the 1970's seemed
pretty awful and corrupt. But as soon as Caro asked for more details of
the present, they always acted like they knew something but would just hem
and haw and produce nothing solid. They just kept saying 'well it
happened back then, OF COURSE its happening now!' but wouldn't offer
anything of substance. Just like everyone already suspected - Russ's time
was in the 1970s and he has no idea about cheating, poker, or poker theory
in the present day and time. End of story.


Bruce Wayne

_________________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com - http://www.recpoker.com

[Russ Georgiev]

"lift-off" <anonymous@aol.com> wrote in message news:<3f2064b3$0$39685$9a6e19ea@news.newshosting.com>...
> russ, the seal;

A Seal Member, hello
>
> largely what you say is true and after two years I cannot grasp why you
> pursue it with such vigor. just ego? because only those that know agree
> with you? I would like to see the games cleaned up but do not think it
> will happen for the same money reasons that you give. my problem is that
> you throw some random fish in the frying pan with the guilty ones.

Have thrown no random innocent fish i nto the pot.



Once
> you start everyone becomes dirty. many Vietnamese are guilty of collusion
> and other cheating scams but not all. Tak the cambodian is clean (I
> think).

I have stated Tak the Cambodian is an honest player. Mike Caro was
under the impression he was not. I gave Tak 2 big thumbs up as being
an honest player.




R Schwartz is CK (stands for crazy kid, given to him 30 or so
> years ago). AS is still his partner I imagine.

CK was/is a cheat but is now really crazy. committed crazy.


The stardust probably ran
> the dirtiest cardroom of all time 20 years ago, but the high limit games
> in Las Vegas are always questionable and many who play in them are dirty
> and have long been dirty.
>
> And yes Russ is a WCP, don't know why he tries to prove it arguing with
> computers and entertainers that claim to be theoreticians. Hey Russ, why
> not let the sleeping ones sleep on?

You must know the SEAL doesn't stop. Especially us ELEPHANT SEALS.
>
>
> On Jul 24 2003 1:50PM, Newgca wrote:
>
> > Mike Caro: So what limit do you think - 75 is ok or not ok?
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Posted using RecPoker.com - http://www.recpoker.com

[Dark Detective]

On Jul 24 2003 10:17PM, Newgca wrote:

> >How would you know if Russ is a WCP?
>
> How do you know I'm not?
>

Easy. I read your "theory" and the simplistic mind that generated them.
Thats a pretty damn good way to determine that, don't you think? Just like
I know a guy with a fake leg will not win the 100m dash at the 2004
Olympics, I know your peabrain is not world class anything. And How do
YOU know that I am not a WORLD CLASS "World Class Player" Detector? Just
saying it is proof, right, in your peabrain?

Hey Russ, I got another sad sack Internet site for you to go to. Its for
REAL, I promise and right up your alley! Send him money ASAP!

http://geocities.com/man_wit_hiv_just_lookin_4_friend

_________________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com - http://www.recpoker.com