Phil Sandler
05-01-2005, 03:25 PM
I don't understand why this crap keeps getting posted here. I know
it's an open forum, and I completely support that. But if you want to
create a big screaming argument with a bunch of angry, unhappy people
(like yourself), why don't you take this to alt.politics?
The problem with talking about this kind of thing here is that it will
elicit responses from people who make genuine poker contributions to
this forum; people who read their responses will feel bias toward them
in the future (positive or negative). This can either improve or hurt
the poster's credibility, depending on the individual's own leanings.
Either way, it can pinch value away from the whole thing.
Cheers,
Phil
Chip Ed Up <anonymous@techemail.com> wrote in message news:<oprt63jpnqcbqx8y@news.sbcglobal.net>...
> Isn't it funny that the only way Franken can sell books is to talk about
> conservatives? Which leads me to...
>
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,95162,00.html
>
> Yes ladies and gentlemen, more lies from the left.
>
> Speaking of lies, did you catch Gray Davis at UCLA running his con job? It
> was too funny. You would think he was trying to be Clinton. Oh that is
> right he was being coached by Clinton. If you get a chance to see the whole
> thing, ask yourself this: why did he not say anything yet looked exactly
> like Billy C? Answer: the libs think we are so stupid that we can be fooled
> by gestures, vacuous denials, claims of a right wing conspiracy, and taxes
> being called contributions.
>
> Current polls say that Gray Davis is less poplular than Richard Nixon right
> before he resigned as President. 20% say they approve of him as Gov, in a
> state that is largely democrats.
it's an open forum, and I completely support that. But if you want to
create a big screaming argument with a bunch of angry, unhappy people
(like yourself), why don't you take this to alt.politics?
The problem with talking about this kind of thing here is that it will
elicit responses from people who make genuine poker contributions to
this forum; people who read their responses will feel bias toward them
in the future (positive or negative). This can either improve or hurt
the poster's credibility, depending on the individual's own leanings.
Either way, it can pinch value away from the whole thing.
Cheers,
Phil
Chip Ed Up <anonymous@techemail.com> wrote in message news:<oprt63jpnqcbqx8y@news.sbcglobal.net>...
> Isn't it funny that the only way Franken can sell books is to talk about
> conservatives? Which leads me to...
>
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,95162,00.html
>
> Yes ladies and gentlemen, more lies from the left.
>
> Speaking of lies, did you catch Gray Davis at UCLA running his con job? It
> was too funny. You would think he was trying to be Clinton. Oh that is
> right he was being coached by Clinton. If you get a chance to see the whole
> thing, ask yourself this: why did he not say anything yet looked exactly
> like Billy C? Answer: the libs think we are so stupid that we can be fooled
> by gestures, vacuous denials, claims of a right wing conspiracy, and taxes
> being called contributions.
>
> Current polls say that Gray Davis is less poplular than Richard Nixon right
> before he resigned as President. 20% say they approve of him as Gov, in a
> state that is largely democrats.