accountant
05-01-2005, 04:20 PM
Now that I've read the article, I must say that Cooke makes a very good
point - a problem with much of the advice on internet forums is that it's
inaccurate. He offers some names of individuals that are reliable at
United Poker Forum. I don't see anything wrong with that. I read RGP
daily and offer this opinion of the article.
Good job Cooke.
On Apr 18 2003 5:01PM, Bad Bob the Albino wrote:
> On 18 Apr 2003 21:24:34 -0700, tnpokerpro@hotmail.com (TNPokerPro)
> wrote:
>
> >Is it ok to post hand histories from some of the more established
> >online sites? I wanted to post some hands and get some opinions on my
> >play.
> >
> >What I don't want is to get banned from any of the sites for posting
> >actual hand histories.
> >
> >Is it ok???
>
> We got people at RGP that just thrive on hand histories. It is common
> pratice to edit the sensitive info to protect the guilty....
>
> post away....
>
> Bad Bob
_________________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com - http://www.recpoker.com
point - a problem with much of the advice on internet forums is that it's
inaccurate. He offers some names of individuals that are reliable at
United Poker Forum. I don't see anything wrong with that. I read RGP
daily and offer this opinion of the article.
Good job Cooke.
On Apr 18 2003 5:01PM, Bad Bob the Albino wrote:
> On 18 Apr 2003 21:24:34 -0700, tnpokerpro@hotmail.com (TNPokerPro)
> wrote:
>
> >Is it ok to post hand histories from some of the more established
> >online sites? I wanted to post some hands and get some opinions on my
> >play.
> >
> >What I don't want is to get banned from any of the sites for posting
> >actual hand histories.
> >
> >Is it ok???
>
> We got people at RGP that just thrive on hand histories. It is common
> pratice to edit the sensitive info to protect the guilty....
>
> post away....
>
> Bad Bob
_________________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com - http://www.recpoker.com