C0y0te
05-01-2005, 04:20 PM
If you were trying to maximize chances you would have been playing 5
tables and not 4.
On Aug 22 2003 1:24AM, unimportant wrote:
> Hope I don't set myself up for too much spam registering here but having a
> personal involvement in the matter I wanted to comment.
> Some of the remarks on the rail,here and at 2+2 seem to imply that those
> winning micro limit tables were full of lucky,undeserving morons.Correct
> me if I'm wrong but weren't they the best seats in the house during the
> 100,000,000th hand promo?
> That was certainly my thinking when I planted myself at 4 such tables last
> night,maximize my chances of winning while minimizing my investment.I
> wasn't there to play poker,one table at a time is enough for me,I was
> there hoping to win $10k or maybe just a tourney entry and shirt.
> So I spent $1.47 and around 11 of 15 hours mostly sitting out on 4
> tables,playing just enough to avoid getting booted off any and folding
> furiously as the big hands drew near.
> To my surprise and pokerstars credit I experienced not the slightest
> problem despite my 56K connection and was delighted to look in the top
> left corner of my screen this morning and see hand #100000000.My delight
> waned a little when the one guy showed his K but I was well satisfied with
> $2,500 and felt as if I'd just made the final table of a big tourney or
> something.
> Hopefully I'll do that on Sunday.67 players,nl holdem and $25K for 27 to
> share and I'm seriously considering just showing up an hour late and
> taking it from there.I rarely play nl tourneys preferring limit so any
> advice would be welcome.
> Thanks for reading.
_________________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com - http://www.recpoker.com
tables and not 4.
On Aug 22 2003 1:24AM, unimportant wrote:
> Hope I don't set myself up for too much spam registering here but having a
> personal involvement in the matter I wanted to comment.
> Some of the remarks on the rail,here and at 2+2 seem to imply that those
> winning micro limit tables were full of lucky,undeserving morons.Correct
> me if I'm wrong but weren't they the best seats in the house during the
> 100,000,000th hand promo?
> That was certainly my thinking when I planted myself at 4 such tables last
> night,maximize my chances of winning while minimizing my investment.I
> wasn't there to play poker,one table at a time is enough for me,I was
> there hoping to win $10k or maybe just a tourney entry and shirt.
> So I spent $1.47 and around 11 of 15 hours mostly sitting out on 4
> tables,playing just enough to avoid getting booted off any and folding
> furiously as the big hands drew near.
> To my surprise and pokerstars credit I experienced not the slightest
> problem despite my 56K connection and was delighted to look in the top
> left corner of my screen this morning and see hand #100000000.My delight
> waned a little when the one guy showed his K but I was well satisfied with
> $2,500 and felt as if I'd just made the final table of a big tourney or
> something.
> Hopefully I'll do that on Sunday.67 players,nl holdem and $25K for 27 to
> share and I'm seriously considering just showing up an hour late and
> taking it from there.I rarely play nl tourneys preferring limit so any
> advice would be welcome.
> Thanks for reading.
_________________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com - http://www.recpoker.com