OT: Bushies...Are you f***ing kidding me????

[OrangeSFO]

http://www.kbtoys.com/genProduct.html/PID/2431939/ctid/17?_ts=y&ls=toys&_e=3f464&_v=3F4649935uwFa89BE827BFF8&_ts=y

Oh my God, November '04 is coming

November '04 is coming
November '04 is coming
November '04 is coming
November '04 is coming....

[FL Turbo]

On 22 Aug 2003 09:51:23 -0700, turgorsfo@aol.com (OrangeSFO) wrote:

>http://www.kbtoys.com/genProduct.html/PID/2431939/ctid/17?_ts=y&ls=toys&_e=3f464&_v=3F4649935uwFa89BE827BFF8&_ts=y
>
>Oh my God, November '04 is coming
>
>November '04 is coming
>November '04 is coming
>November '04 is coming
>November '04 is coming....


And then in no time at all.
Santa Claus will be here again!!!

I can't remember if I asked you before, but which one of the Nine
Dwarves will you be supporting?

Or are you waiting for Hilary?
(Did you know she was named after a mountain climber?)

Or will you wait until The Party selects someone?

Heh, I think I just answered my own question.
Nevermind.

[Harry Clyde]

I thought that dropping acid went out in the 80's. Apparently you found an
old stash.

[Chip Ed Up]

Your an idiot.

Do you realize that more people die in LA per day, than in Iraq? That also
means per month, and per year. Just so you know. And Iraq is a war zone.

Dumbass.



On 23 Aug 2003 00:50:04 -0700, OrangeSFO <turgorsfo@aol.com> wrote:

> FL Turbo <noemail@notime.com> wrote in message
> news:<9bqckvo1jg61u6m4vmd4kh6a98meqr90a1@4ax.com>...
>> On 22 Aug 2003 09:51:23 -0700, turgorsfo@aol.com (OrangeSFO) wrote:
>>
>
>
>> I can't remember if I asked you before, but which one of the Nine
>> Dwarves will you be supporting?
>
>
> I should ask who YOU will be supporting. It won't be Bush. He will
> be positively RADIOACTIVE a year from now...
>
> -because nobody's going to vote for the "President" who will--by then,
> on his watch-- have had 10-15 times the casualties in Iraq after "the
> end of major combat operations" as before.
>
> -because the country will be screaming bloody murder.
>
> -because congressional Republicans will be in full revolt against the
> nakedly imperialist Bush administration and putting forward another
> candidate for the nomination at the New York convention, which the GOP
> has so crassly moved all the way back to the second anniversary week
> of 9/11.
>
> Who will YOU be voting for my friend? You'd be well advised to not
> dismiss the eruption that is building...
>

[FL Turbo]

On 23 Aug 2003 00:50:04 -0700, turgorsfo@aol.com (OrangeSFO) wrote:

>FL Turbo <noemail@notime.com> wrote in message news:<9bqckvo1jg61u6m4vmd4kh6a98meqr90a1@4ax.com>...
>> On 22 Aug 2003 09:51:23 -0700, turgorsfo@aol.com (OrangeSFO) wrote:
>>
>
>
>> I can't remember if I asked you before, but which one of the Nine
>> Dwarves will you be supporting?
>
>
>I should ask who YOU will be supporting. It won't be Bush. He will
>be positively RADIOACTIVE a year from now...
>
>-because nobody's going to vote for the "President" who will--by then,
>on his watch-- have had 10-15 times the casualties in Iraq after "the
>end of major combat operations" as before.

Lemme see here
That would be around 1500-2000 casualties in about a year
More than 30 per week.

So far we haven't seen anything near that number, so it would take a
major series of attacks to get those numbers.

It would be a major setback for US interests.

Don't you hope that you're wrong?

>
>-because the country will be screaming bloody murder.
>
>-because congressional Republicans will be in full revolt against the
>nakedly imperialist Bush administration and putting forward another
>candidate for the nomination at the New York convention, which the GOP
>has so crassly moved all the way back to the second anniversary week
>of 9/11.

Just the mere thought of a naked imperialist revolts me.

Never seen one and hope I never will.

>
>Who will YOU be voting for my friend? You'd be well advised to not
>dismiss the eruption that is building...

I can imagine a few eruptions in large cities, like Seattle for
example, but the people in flyover country won't be erupting any time
soon.

I used to vote for a lot of Libertarian candidates as a
none-of-the-above vote, but at this point in the world situation, a
wasted vote is not an option.

At one time an isolationist policy made some sense, but now the oceans
on our borders can't protect us.

Not a time for a loose, passive policy, but a time for a tight
agressive policy.
(I can hardly believe I even typed that last sentence, let alone sent
it out onto the net)

I will leave it as an exercise to the reader, to deduce who I will
vote for in the next election.