hey PBO...here comes Stars!

[AJohn808]

Party -10,000 Stars 7,500 didnt you promise everybody on rgp a box of
jelly filled if Stars ever catches Party? looks like the Stars will be shining
down at the ol Krispy Kreme real soon. "turn out the liiiiiiights, the Party's
over....." hee hee

[Patrick B. OMalley]

You took my statement wrong. I don't and never have looked at total connected
players. I only look at real money players. That's the sign of the actual
success of the site because that's how I and the site make money. Me playing
the games and the site making the rake. So you may be right. Total connected
players is 10.500 right now at Party.

But in the number I have always looked at and referred to is real money
players.

Right now....

Party Poker 4872

UltimateBet 1678

PokerStars 1353

Paradise 1217

So as you can see, the numbers have increased slightly at all rooms over the
past few months. But the increase at Party is just as high. They almost broke
5000 real money players last night.

So for now, I'll keep my prediction. It may happen someday but unless
something huge happens, the numbers and the extreme lead by Party will remain
close to how it has been for the past year.

Oink.



>Subject: hey PBO...here comes Stars!
>From: ajohn808@aol.com (AJohn808)
>Date: 8/27/2003 8:18 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <20030827231847.18024.00000025@mb-m24.aol.com>
>
> Party -10,000 Stars 7,500 didnt you promise everybody on rgp a box of
>jelly filled if Stars ever catches Party? looks like the Stars will be
>shining
>down at the ol Krispy Kreme real soon. "turn out the liiiiiiights, the
>Party's
>over....." hee hee
>
>
>
>
>
>

[D]

>So for now, I'll keep my prediction. It may happen someday but unless
>something huge happens, the numbers and the extreme lead by Party will
remain
>close to how it has been for the past year.

Unbelievable. Suddenly three or four months has become a year. I mean, I
know you're totally biased, but have you completely lost touch with reality?


"Patrick B. OMalley" <pbocop@aol.comoinkoink> wrote in message
news:20030827233931.10706.00000080@mb-m29.aol.com...
> You took my statement wrong. I don't and never have looked at total
connected
> players. I only look at real money players. That's the sign of the
actual
> success of the site because that's how I and the site make money. Me
playing
> the games and the site making the rake. So you may be right. Total
connected
> players is 10.500 right now at Party.
>
> But in the number I have always looked at and referred to is real money
> players.
>
> Right now....
>
> Party Poker 4872
>
> UltimateBet 1678
>
> PokerStars 1353
>
> Paradise 1217
>
> So as you can see, the numbers have increased slightly at all rooms over
the
> past few months. But the increase at Party is just as high. They almost
broke
> 5000 real money players last night.
>
> So for now, I'll keep my prediction. It may happen someday but unless
> something huge happens, the numbers and the extreme lead by Party will
remain
> close to how it has been for the past year.
>
> Oink.
>
>
>
> >Subject: hey PBO...here comes Stars!
> >From: ajohn808@aol.com (AJohn808)
> >Date: 8/27/2003 8:18 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >Message-id: <20030827231847.18024.00000025@mb-m24.aol.com>
> >
> > Party -10,000 Stars 7,500 didnt you promise everybody on rgp a
box of
> >jelly filled if Stars ever catches Party? looks like the Stars will be
> >shining
> >down at the ol Krispy Kreme real soon. "turn out the liiiiiiights, the
> >Party's
> >over....." hee hee
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

[dave keiser]

let's just take a look at the 3/6 and higher holdem games going now and
see if pokerstars is anywhere close.

9 15/30 10 handed
4 15/30 6 handed
4 10/20 10 handed
3 10/20 6 handed
8 5/10 10 handed
15 5/10 6 handed
18 3/6 10 handed

CASE CLOSED




On Aug 27 2003 11:18PM, AJohn808 wrote:

> Party -10,000 Stars 7,500 didnt you promise everybody on rgp a box of
> jelly filled if Stars ever catches Party? looks like the Stars will be
shining
> down at the ol Krispy Kreme real soon. "turn out the liiiiiiights, the
Party's
> over....." hee hee

_________________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com - http://www.recpoker.com

[AJohn808]

>From: "dave keiser"

>9 15/30 10 handed
> 4 15/30 6 handed
> 4 10/20 10 handed
> 3 10/20 6 handed
> 8 5/10 10 handed
> 15 5/10 6 handed
> 18 3/6 10 handed
>
>CASE CLOSED

CASE REOPENED! what the hell do those numbers represent? lol.

[Don Quixote]

Hey John, long time no talk to you. Thanks for posting about the increase
of customers at Stars. I havent been there in ages, but I will go back
and check it out.

I have had it with Party. Their software just screwed me out of a 16 big
bet pot while playing two tables. My "fold" action on one table
registered on the other table where I had just check/raised the turn with
10 high nut straight. The hand history shows the river as everyone
checking and me folding. A lower straight won.

Not the first time this has happened to me, but it will be the last time.
Screw Party and the O'Malley and other shills.

Don Quixote

On Aug 28 2003 3:18AM, AJohn808 wrote:

> Party -10,000 Stars 7,500 didnt you promise everybody on rgp a box of
> jelly filled if Stars ever catches Party? looks like the Stars will be
shining
> down at the ol Krispy Kreme real soon. "turn out the liiiiiiights, the
Party's
> over....." hee hee

_________________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com - http://www.recpoker.com

[Patrick B. OMalley]

No need for such hostility Quixote. You really don't need to screw me, just
bend me over.

Do you have your 2 games directly on top of each other ? I play 3 games at a
time and can say, even though I am a shill, that I have never, never, never had
this happen and I have never, ever heard of this happening without it being the
error of the player. Not saying that it didn't happen to you but do you have
your resolution set so that 2 games are far apart from each other and there is
no chance of mis clicking on the wrong game ?

I wouldn't go back to Party either if I was you. Leave for good. But if you
want help with your screen setting, let me know.

PBO

>Subject: Re: hey PBO...here comes Stars!
>From: "Don Quixote" anonymous@joink.com
>Date: 8/28/2003 9:44 AM Pacific Daylight Time
>Message-id: <3f4e316e$0$23236$9a6e19ea@news.newshosting.com>
>
>Hey John, long time no talk to you. Thanks for posting about the increase
>of customers at Stars. I havent been there in ages, but I will go back
>and check it out.
>
>I have had it with Party. Their software just screwed me out of a 16 big
>bet pot while playing two tables. My "fold" action on one table
>registered on the other table where I had just check/raised the turn with
>10 high nut straight. The hand history shows the river as everyone
>checking and me folding. A lower straight won.
>
>Not the first time this has happened to me, but it will be the last time.
>Screw Party and the O'Malley and other shills.
>
>Don Quixote
>
>On Aug 28 2003 3:18AM, AJohn808 wrote:
>
>> Party -10,000 Stars 7,500 didnt you promise everybody on rgp a box of
>> jelly filled if Stars ever catches Party? looks like the Stars will be
>shining
>> down at the ol Krispy Kreme real soon. "turn out the liiiiiiights, the
>Party's
>> over....." hee hee
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Posted using RecPoker.com - http://www.recpoker.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Don Quixote]

I am sorry, PBO, I was just pissed off. You should be a CSR. You handle
rants very well :-) As far as the double ass hole moron, pigdog and a few
others that called me idiot, moron, and other derogatory terms, I dont
know crap about computers. Why dont some of these know-it all asses offer
a little constructive criticism instead of blindly swinging away.

I have a 19" monitor. When I play two tables, which isnt often, i open
two windows. One is hidden til the other table calls me back. Or, I can
click the button that takes me to the other table myself. I simply do not
know how to get two tables on my monitor at the same time for simultaneous
viewing. Someone else mentioned dragging the top of the screen down to
where I want it. I did and it worked, and I will go back in a few
minutes. I presume I simply set down at another table and size it the
same way. I will report back.

Thanks PBO for not being as obnoxious as I was and for your constructive
reply. Also, thanks to the other posters that offered suggestion. To my
detractors who are clueless, unsocialble, insensitive boobs, why dont you
try reasoning in your own little minds that you might be talking with an
old 70+ lonely widower that plays poker online to keep from killing
himself. I know you younger guys dont like setting next to a stinking old
man because you have posted that and worse here so many times. Just be
grateful you cant smell my stink in cyberspace.

I guess I should have resisted the temptation to reply in kind to the
youngsters, but I just couldnt resist. Had to let off a little steam.

Don Quixote



On Aug 28 2003 5:21PM, Patrick B. OMalley wrote:

> No need for such hostility Quixote. You really don't need to screw me, just
> bend me over.
>
> Do you have your 2 games directly on top of each other ? I play 3 games at a
> time and can say, even though I am a shill, that I have never, never, never
had
> this happen and I have never, ever heard of this happening without it being
the
> error of the player. Not saying that it didn't happen to you but do you have
> your resolution set so that 2 games are far apart from each other and there
is
> no chance of mis clicking on the wrong game ?
>
> I wouldn't go back to Party either if I was you. Leave for good. But if you
> want help with your screen setting, let me know.
>
> PBO
>
> >Subject: Re: hey PBO...here comes Stars!
> >From: "Don Quixote" anonymous@joink.com
> >Date: 8/28/2003 9:44 AM Pacific Daylight Time
> >Message-id: <3f4e316e$0$23236$9a6e19ea@news.newshosting.com>
> >
> >Hey John, long time no talk to you. Thanks for posting about the increase
> >of customers at Stars. I havent been there in ages, but I will go back
> >and check it out.
> >
> >I have had it with Party. Their software just screwed me out of a 16 big
> >bet pot while playing two tables. My "fold" action on one table
> >registered on the other table where I had just check/raised the turn with
> >10 high nut straight. The hand history shows the river as everyone
> >checking and me folding. A lower straight won.
> >
> >Not the first time this has happened to me, but it will be the last time.
> >Screw Party and the O'Malley and other shills.
> >
> >Don Quixote
> >
> >On Aug 28 2003 3:18AM, AJohn808 wrote:
> >
> >> Party -10,000 Stars 7,500 didnt you promise everybody on rgp a box
of
> >> jelly filled if Stars ever catches Party? looks like the Stars will be
> >shining
> >> down at the ol Krispy Kreme real soon. "turn out the liiiiiiights, the
> >Party's
> >> over....." hee hee
> >

_________________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com - http://www.recpoker.com

[Patrick B. OMalley]

Quixote...email me later...

PBOCOP@aol.com

I'll guide you through it. You'll love it. Makes it so much easier and no risk
at all of misclicking. I'll even let you call me if you want me to do it that
way. Ha...

[Samuel C. Croy]

On 28 Aug 2003 23:25:48 GMT, "Don Quixote" <anonymous@joink.com>
wrote:
>Thanks PBO for not being as obnoxious as I was and for your constructive
>reply. Also, thanks to the other posters that offered suggestion. To my
>detractors who are clueless, unsocialble, insensitive boobs, why dont you
>try reasoning in your own little minds that you might be talking with an
>old 70+ lonely widower that plays poker online to keep from killing
>himself. I know you younger guys dont like setting next to a stinking old
>man because you have posted that and worse here so many times. Just be
>grateful you cant smell my stink in cyberspace.
>
>Don Quixote

Hey Don,
Hold on there before you pull the trigger, you can't smell worse than
me... I ain't a widower yet, but as soon as I can get an extra couple
of bucks for some ammo.... (that's just a sick joke Margaret).
I don't play more than one table very often Don but if you are using
windows click on that double page icon at the top right of your screen
between the X and the - sign. That should reduce your screen from
maximum to something less. If it doesn't then grab the lower right
corner of your screen by clicking and holding your left mouse button
and reduce the size of your screen that way.
Depending on where my seat is at the table I pull one screen down and
right and the other up and left (or what ever combination works for
you), just enough so I can see and click on either screen whenever I
need to. That will give you a perspective on which game you are
active with at any given time. Never played more than two at a time
but I don't see why it wouldn't work with multiple screens.
And lighten up you old fart... you can always argue with me about
something... I'm easy.





-- Sam Croy

[Peg Smith]

In article <3f4e8f7b$0$10428$9a6e19ea@news.newshosting.com>, "Don Quixote"
<anonymous@joink.com> writes:

>...Why dont some of these know-it all asses offer
>a little constructive criticism instead of blindly swinging away...

Because you didn't.

Peg

[D]

OK, I'll tell you. In February (six months ago), Party peaked out at less
than 500 ring game players, whereas Paradise peaked out at just over 1000.
Those numbers come from PokerPulse. Party didn't even come close to passing
Paradise until a ways into the WPT season. Now you tell me, when was that?
Was it, perhaps, three or four months ago?

We can argue all day about which site is better or why Party is ahead, but
there's no reason to disagree on objective facts.


"Patrick B. OMalley" <pbocop@aol.comoinkoink> wrote in message
news:20030828110417.20751.00000040@mb-m21.aol.com...
> Ok....8 months.....so you say 3 months and I say a year....what is reality
?
> You tell me now....
>
> oink.
>
> >Subject: Re: hey PBO...here comes Stars!
> >From: "D" d-worksNO@SPAMcomcast.net
> >Date: 8/27/2003 10:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time
> >Message-id: <4Ig3b.214987$cF.70628@rwcrnsc53>
> >
> >>So for now, I'll keep my prediction. It may happen someday but unless
> >>something huge happens, the numbers and the extreme lead by Party will
> >remain
> >>close to how it has been for the past year.
> >
> >Unbelievable. Suddenly three or four months has become a year. I mean,
I
> >know you're totally biased, but have you completely lost touch with
reality?
> >
> >
> >"Patrick B. OMalley" <pbocop@aol.comoinkoink> wrote in message
> >news:20030827233931.10706.00000080@mb-m29.aol.com...
> >> You took my statement wrong. I don't and never have looked at total
> >connected
> >> players. I only look at real money players. That's the sign of the
> >actual
> >> success of the site because that's how I and the site make money. Me
> >playing
> >> the games and the site making the rake. So you may be right. Total
> >connected
> >> players is 10.500 right now at Party.
> >>
> >> But in the number I have always looked at and referred to is real money
> >> players.
> >>
> >> Right now....
> >>
> >> Party Poker 4872
> >>
> >> UltimateBet 1678
> >>
> >> PokerStars 1353
> >>
> >> Paradise 1217
> >>
> >> So as you can see, the numbers have increased slightly at all rooms
over
> >the
> >> past few months. But the increase at Party is just as high. They
almost
> >broke
> >> 5000 real money players last night.
> >>
> >> So for now, I'll keep my prediction. It may happen someday but unless
> >> something huge happens, the numbers and the extreme lead by Party will
> >remain
> >> close to how it has been for the past year.
> >>
> >> Oink.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >Subject: hey PBO...here comes Stars!
> >> >From: ajohn808@aol.com (AJohn808)
> >> >Date: 8/27/2003 8:18 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >> >Message-id: <20030827231847.18024.00000025@mb-m24.aol.com>
> >> >
> >> > Party -10,000 Stars 7,500 didnt you promise everybody on rgp a
> >box of
> >> >jelly filled if Stars ever catches Party? looks like the Stars will be
> >> >shining
> >> >down at the ol Krispy Kreme real soon. "turn out the liiiiiiights, the
> >> >Party's
> >> >over....." hee hee
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

[Patrick B. O'Malley - PBOCOP@aol.com]

I don't know for sure....

But I think that Party had much more than 500 real money players in
February. Then again, I could be wrong. Just seems like a long time ago
since they gained 4500 players more per night.


--
Patrick B. O'Malley....PBOCOP


"D" <d-worksNO@SPAMcomcast.net> wrote in message
news:AiA3b.291363$uu5.64355@sccrnsc04...
> OK, I'll tell you. In February (six months ago), Party peaked out at less
> than 500 ring game players, whereas Paradise peaked out at just over 1000.
> Those numbers come from PokerPulse. Party didn't even come close to
passing
> Paradise until a ways into the WPT season. Now you tell me, when was
that?
> Was it, perhaps, three or four months ago?
>
> We can argue all day about which site is better or why Party is ahead, but
> there's no reason to disagree on objective facts.
>
>
> "Patrick B. OMalley" <pbocop@aol.comoinkoink> wrote in message
> news:20030828110417.20751.00000040@mb-m21.aol.com...
> > Ok....8 months.....so you say 3 months and I say a year....what is
reality
> ?
> > You tell me now....
> >
> > oink.
> >
> > >Subject: Re: hey PBO...here comes Stars!
> > >From: "D" d-worksNO@SPAMcomcast.net
> > >Date: 8/27/2003 10:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time
> > >Message-id: <4Ig3b.214987$cF.70628@rwcrnsc53>
> > >
> > >>So for now, I'll keep my prediction. It may happen someday but unless
> > >>something huge happens, the numbers and the extreme lead by Party will
> > >remain
> > >>close to how it has been for the past year.
> > >
> > >Unbelievable. Suddenly three or four months has become a year. I
mean,
> I
> > >know you're totally biased, but have you completely lost touch with
> reality?
> > >
> > >
> > >"Patrick B. OMalley" <pbocop@aol.comoinkoink> wrote in message
> > >news:20030827233931.10706.00000080@mb-m29.aol.com...
> > >> You took my statement wrong. I don't and never have looked at total
> > >connected
> > >> players. I only look at real money players. That's the sign of the
> > >actual
> > >> success of the site because that's how I and the site make money. Me
> > >playing
> > >> the games and the site making the rake. So you may be right. Total
> > >connected
> > >> players is 10.500 right now at Party.
> > >>
> > >> But in the number I have always looked at and referred to is real
money
> > >> players.
> > >>
> > >> Right now....
> > >>
> > >> Party Poker 4872
> > >>
> > >> UltimateBet 1678
> > >>
> > >> PokerStars 1353
> > >>
> > >> Paradise 1217
> > >>
> > >> So as you can see, the numbers have increased slightly at all rooms
> over
> > >the
> > >> past few months. But the increase at Party is just as high. They
> almost
> > >broke
> > >> 5000 real money players last night.
> > >>
> > >> So for now, I'll keep my prediction. It may happen someday but
unless
> > >> something huge happens, the numbers and the extreme lead by Party
will
> > >remain
> > >> close to how it has been for the past year.
> > >>
> > >> Oink.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >Subject: hey PBO...here comes Stars!
> > >> >From: ajohn808@aol.com (AJohn808)
> > >> >Date: 8/27/2003 8:18 PM Pacific Standard Time
> > >> >Message-id: <20030827231847.18024.00000025@mb-m24.aol.com>
> > >> >
> > >> > Party -10,000 Stars 7,500 didnt you promise everybody on rgp
a
> > >box of
> > >> >jelly filled if Stars ever catches Party? looks like the Stars will
be
> > >> >shining
> > >> >down at the ol Krispy Kreme real soon. "turn out the liiiiiiights,
the
> > >> >Party's
> > >> >over....." hee hee
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

[jimpepper]

On Aug 28 2003 1:01PM, Samuel C. Croy wrote:

> On 28 Aug 2003 23:25:48 GMT, "Don Quixote" <anonymous@joink.com>
> wrote:
> >Thanks PBO for not being as obnoxious as I was and for your constructive
> >reply. Also, thanks to the other posters that offered suggestion. To my
> >detractors who are clueless, unsocialble, insensitive boobs, why dont you
> >try reasoning in your own little minds that you might be talking with an
> >old 70+ lonely widower that plays poker online to keep from killing
> >himself. I know you younger guys dont like setting next to a stinking old
> >man because you have posted that and worse here so many times. Just be
> >grateful you cant smell my stink in cyberspace.

Old guys are funny! I can smell that Old Spice from here....
just kidding guys.
jim



> >
> >Don Quixote
>
> Hey Don,
> Hold on there before you pull the trigger, you can't smell worse than
> me... I ain't a widower yet, but as soon as I can get an extra couple
> of bucks for some ammo.... (that's just a sick joke Margaret).
> I don't play more than one table very often Don but if you are using
> windows click on that double page icon at the top right of your screen
> between the X and the - sign. That should reduce your screen from
> maximum to something less. If it doesn't then grab the lower right
> corner of your screen by clicking and holding your left mouse button
> and reduce the size of your screen that way.
> Depending on where my seat is at the table I pull one screen down and
> right and the other up and left (or what ever combination works for
> you), just enough so I can see and click on either screen whenever I
> need to. That will give you a perspective on which game you are
> active with at any given time. Never played more than two at a time
> but I don't see why it wouldn't work with multiple screens.
> And lighten up you old fart... you can always argue with me about
> something... I'm easy.
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Sam Croy

_________________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com - http://www.recpoker.com

[AJohn808]

in the horserace of online poker rooms, it was a huge field with a couple dozen
shooting out of the gate. several have already pulled up lame and had to be
shot (pokerspot, highland?) a few others are walking instead of running -they
may have serious injuries (acr) . a couple of the early leaders tired quickly
and have dropped back (planet), the general field is still quite large
(pokerroom, truepoker). 4 horses have pulled away -Party, Stars, UB, and
Paradise.
but they are just now reaching the first turn. and its a very long race. so
who has the best trainer and jockey (owners/managers)? and will a spectator
(the US Govt) run onto the track and disrupt the race?

[Mike O'Malley]

"AJohn808" <ajohn808@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030829112609.21865.00000108@mb-m04.aol.com...
> in the horserace of online poker rooms, it was a huge field with a couple
dozen
> shooting out of the gate. several have already pulled up lame and had to
be
> shot (pokerspot, highland?) a few others are walking instead of
running -they
> may have serious injuries (acr) . a couple of the early leaders tired
quickly
> and have dropped back (planet), the general field is still quite large
> (pokerroom, truepoker). 4 horses have pulled away -Party, Stars, UB, and
> Paradise.
> but they are just now reaching the first turn. and its a very long race.
so
> who has the best trainer and jockey (owners/managers)? and will a
spectator
> (the US Govt) run onto the track and disrupt the race?

Good comparison. One problem...while the other 3 are at the first turn
Party is already coming down the back stretch. But horses have been known to
crash and burn with big leads. My prediction: Party by 1 length, with a 3
way tie for second. And a dark horse coming out of nowhere to take a strong
3rd.

[Steve Kishner]

"Mike O'Malley" <rzitup@adelphia.net.PARTYPOKER.com> wrote in
message news:2rL3b.10791$Nc.6119201@news1.news.adelphia.net...
>
> Good comparison. One problem...while the other 3 are at the
first turn
> Party is already coming down the back stretch. But horses have
been known to
> crash and burn with big leads. My prediction: Party by 1
length, with a 3
> way tie for second. And a dark horse coming out of nowhere to
take a strong
> 3rd.
>
I don't do horses, but wouldn't the dark horse be a ?strong? 5th?

[Mike O'Malley]

"Steve Kishner" <skishner@ix.NODAMNSPAMnetcom.com> wrote in message
news:eZP3b.726$Lk5.166@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Mike O'Malley" <rzitup@adelphia.net.PARTYPOKER.com> wrote in
> message news:2rL3b.10791$Nc.6119201@news1.news.adelphia.net...
> >
> > Good comparison. One problem...while the other 3 are at the
> first turn
> > Party is already coming down the back stretch. But horses have
> been known to
> > crash and burn with big leads. My prediction: Party by 1
> length, with a 3
> > way tie for second. And a dark horse coming out of nowhere to
> take a strong
> > 3rd.
> >
> I don't do horses, but wouldn't the dark horse be a ?strong? 5th?
>


yes