"Anonymous" online Poker Employees trying to twist the facts..

[Dave L]

Seems as though you have PokerStars' user agreement, rules, and bilaws
down pat. You defend support by twisting words around to make it appear
as tho I am crying over making a bad loan, when the issue at hand is why
someone who has scammed several people is not banned from playing.

If there have been so many user complaints about this player (and
PokerStars (perhaps it was even you I was speaking with) has admitted
this) why are they allowed to continue playing, with funds that were
derived via an obvious scam?

You are making your employer look even worse by hiding behind anonymity.
It is not hard to put 2+2 together.

-Dave

** Anonymous RGP ACCESS at http://www.LiveActionPoker.com

** $100 Deposit Bonus at http://www.FabulousPoker.com

[wg bradley]

C'mon...there's no way that moron works for Pokerstars.


"Dave L" <dlilie@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3f90628b$0$202$75868355@news.frii.net...
> Seems as though you have PokerStars' user agreement, rules, and
bilaws
> down pat. You defend support by twisting words around to make it
appear
> as tho I am crying over making a bad loan, when the issue at hand is
why
> someone who has scammed several people is not banned from playing.
>
> If there have been so many user complaints about this player (and
> PokerStars (perhaps it was even you I was speaking with) has
admitted
> this) why are they allowed to continue playing, with funds that were
> derived via an obvious scam?
>
> You are making your employer look even worse by hiding behind
anonymity.
> It is not hard to put 2+2 together.
>
> -Dave
>
> ** Anonymous RGP ACCESS at http://www.LiveActionPoker.com
>
> ** $100 Deposit Bonus at http://www.FabulousPoker.com

[Anonymous]

Let me wipe my tear away. Geez you are such a baby.

I never once mentioned support. My emails are about you.

As for the agreements I unlike you read them in advance of agreeing to
them. I suggest you try that course of action next time.

In your world 2+2="what I need to say to deflect rightful criticism from
my stupid actions".

You need to get a calculator and a baby sitter. I don't work for PS. If
you had taken the time to read this forum you would know that I have
posted about the fact that PS seems to have some problems awarding post
correctly.

As you are self-absorbed I guess that would be too much to ask.

Nice try though. Been awhile since I have seen that tactic.



On 17 Oct 2003 21:43:39 GMT, Dave L <dlilie@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Seems as though you have PokerStars' user agreement, rules, and bilaws
> down pat. You defend support by twisting words around to make it appear
> as tho I am crying over making a bad loan, when the issue at hand is why
> someone who has scammed several people is not banned from playing.
>
> If there have been so many user complaints about this player (and
> PokerStars (perhaps it was even you I was speaking with) has admitted
> this) why are they allowed to continue playing, with funds that were
> derived via an obvious scam?
>
> You are making your employer look even worse by hiding behind anonymity.
> It is not hard to put 2+2 together.
>
> -Dave
>
> ** Anonymous RGP ACCESS at http://www.LiveActionPoker.com
>
> ** $100 Deposit Bonus at http://www.FabulousPoker.com



--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

[Anonymous]

another country heard from.

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:39:35 GMT, wg bradley <wgb@bogus.ca> wrote:

> C'mon...there's no way that moron works for Pokerstars.

[Calahan MacCool]

Bah, Pokerstars wont' do anything about because "Hustling" in a casino
is an age old tradition and just another way for enterprising people
to make money.

Thats a joke, but it is darn near close to what happens on these
online roleplaying games when people get scammed by other characters.

Dave L <dlilie@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<3f90628b$0$202$75868355@news.frii.net>...
> Seems as though you have PokerStars' user agreement, rules, and bilaws
> down pat. You defend support by twisting words around to make it appear
> as tho I am crying over making a bad loan, when the issue at hand is why
> someone who has scammed several people is not banned from playing.
>
> If there have been so many user complaints about this player (and
> PokerStars (perhaps it was even you I was speaking with) has admitted
> this) why are they allowed to continue playing, with funds that were
> derived via an obvious scam?
>
> You are making your employer look even worse by hiding behind anonymity.
> It is not hard to put 2+2 together.
>
> -Dave
>
> ** Anonymous RGP ACCESS at http://www.LiveActionPoker.com
>
> ** $100 Deposit Bonus at http://www.FabulousPoker.com