ezeriver@hotmail.com (Easy E) wrote in message news:<a58db393.0308022228.77d153ec@posting.google.com>...
>
> QuadNines@hotmail.com (QuadNines) wrote in message
> news:<99fd5b1.0308011625.6b15671@posting.google.com>...
>
> [snip many selective quotes]
>
> While I do give you credit for the broadest range of
> repetitive, yet originally rephrased, insults in one
> post that I've ever seen, I will always look to this
> post when I ask myself "Does QuadNines have a vendetta?"

Well, sure. If you slice and dice like that, it looks just plain
insulting. If you take my comments in proper context, however, a
little humor might come through (or not). For example:

When Sklansky listed 2+2 Forum's top 23 hand analysts,
Malmuth didn't cut it. Malmuth isn't the sharpest
knife in the kitchen.

QuadNines@hotmail.com (QuadNines) wrote in message news:<99fd5b1.0308011625.6b15671@posting.google.com>...
> The book is self-published, and it shows. Caveat emptor.
>
> Mason Malmuth's POKER ESSAYS: VOLUME III (PE3) contains many errors.
.........While most of Malmuth's writing mistakes are minor, ....


I sure am glad that I jumped to the bottom line before I tried to read
what I am sure is an abundance of bullcrap that you wrote in between.
What a loser you are. By the way you never have told us just what
experience that you have playing poker in a casino. My guess as
always:NONE!

Vince

QuadNines@hotmail.com (QuadNines) wrote in message news:<99fd5b1.0308031718.3d6b0209@posting.google.com>...

> Well, sure. If you slice and dice like that, it looks just plain
> insulting.

Quads, this statement was pretty funny in and of itself!

This so called "reviewer" is sick in the head.

Listen to his pointless and unsubstantiated insults:

Malmuth isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier.
Malmuth isn't the brightest towel on the beach.
Malmuth isn't the sharpest pencil in the box.
Malmuth isn't the sharpest tool in the shed.
etc. etc.

This could be termed childish, but it indicates a dangerous obsession, and Malmuth would be well in his rights to inform the police about this character.

For the record, I own a copy of PE3, and it is a very interesting book. I don't necessarily agree with all or most of it, but if I did not like it, I would say something like "I do not like this book". What we have above is something diseased rather than a legitimate review. I pity the person who was obsessed to produce it, but I am also concerned about the public safety aspects of this incident.