PokerPartys Poker Forums  

Left Column
 Poker Rooms



  PokerPartys.com



  Free Offers


Go Back   PokerPartys Poker Forums > POKER STRATEGIES > Poker Strategies - Advanced
User Name
Password


Reply
 
  #11  
Old 05-01-2005, 12:03 PM
Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Lederer's Law, or Why I Should Send Howard a Check

FREDJMCCABE@HOTMAIL.COM (FJM@DM) writes:
>The advice you refer to is absolutely essential to success at higher
>limits. Open limping is for suckers.


I always knew I was a sucker.

>Even the vaunted limp reraise is compromised because it gives your
>hand away so quickly.


If you only ever limp re-raise with AA/KK, maybe. Wait, didn't the
"strictly math type" advice specifically address this problem?

>If you are smart enough to begin using this method for opening


So people who don't use this method aren't smart, right?

>you will need to tighten up significantly.


Does playing ATs qualify as tightening up significantly?

>Against better players at higher limits you wont get away with
>value check raises on the turn or river.


But you can get them to fold KQ and AJ pre-flop even after they
see you raising with ATs, right?

>Take AT suited for instance, by raising instead of limping you gain
>much in the way of information, and you will probably fold hands like
>KQo and AJ at the middle to higher limits.


Uh-huh.

>The better you get at implementing this syle the better a player you
>will beome period,


The better you get at playing your hands in a variety of situations,
the better player you will become period.

But I agree that if you are incapable of avoiding information
leakage after open-limping, or do not play well post-flop after
open-limping, then you should probably avoid doing so.
  #12  
Old 05-01-2005, 12:03 PM
Bill chen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Lederer's Law, or Why I Should Send Howard a Check

Howard,

You specifically mentioned the three-bet strategy does not apply in
the blinds, but I think it may still be a good rule in the small
blind. If you have a hand strong enough to play out of position for
3/4 of a bet, it seems you should 3-bet to increase the probability
the big blind folds. If all goes as planned and the BB folds and the
opener calls the third bet, here I think since the small blind is
marked with the stronger distribution of hands for the 3-bet, and
should lead out most of the time.

Bill Chen


"Howard Lederer" <hlederer@cox.net> wrote in message news:<TLUXa.977$Qe.470@fed1read04>...
> Actually, you have simplified what I said a little. I suggested that you
> shouldn't limp when first in. But, you also should either re-raise an
> opening raise or fold when it has been folded to you after the opener and
> you have position. This strategy eliminates on of the biggest leaks I see
> in intermediate players, calling raises when you are likely beat. This rule
> does not apply when you are in the blinds. My point was this. It makes you
> more selective with your starting hands, and when you play after an opener,
> you usually get heads-up for three bets, in position with the best hand. In
> poker this is a good thing.
>
> Howard Lederer
>

Reply

« | »


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:22 PM.